Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglican Fellowship of the Delaware Valley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Diocese of the Holy Cross. Redirects are cheap Black Kite (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Anglican Fellowship of the Delaware Valley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find evidence that this is a notable organization. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not Notable. -- C E  (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete per blatantly failing WP:ORG. With no surprises, created by a WP:SPA account. Cavarrone 09:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Diocese of the Holy Cross. That appears to be a schismatic group of Anglican churches, which has left andother Anglican body over doctrinal matters.  It has 22 churches and probably qualifies to be kept as a denomination(albeit a very small one) .  The article is about a local association within that denomination.  We regularly delete articles on local churches.  I do not see why a local association (probably essentially a ministers' fraternal) should be treated differently.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.