Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angourie Point


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Angourie, New South Wales. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Angourie Point

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Australia.  Shaws username  .  talk  . 14:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * comment As a surfing spot this is likely notable. That said, the tone of the article is hugely unencyclopedic. Mangoe (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * An encyclopaedia article on the Angourie National Surfing Reserve could definitely be written. I can find sources for that, which however encompasses more than the point.  Also note that it would be a break-out subtopic of Angourie, New South Wales, which is fairly bad compared to what a brief search for sources on the NSR turned up, and not even at the point that a sub-article is needed. This article reads like a tourist guide, personal opinions in Wikipedia's voice and all. Uncle G (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Angourie, New South Wales – this article covers that which Wikipedia is not. Anything relevant about the point can be included in the village article, the village actually administratively covers the knob/point and there is no notable reason why a seperate article is warranted. Idiosincrático (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.