Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry Dog and Friends

Angry Dog and Friends was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Non-notable and/or prank/fiction. Zero hits for "Angry Dog and Friends". IMDb and TV Tome can't find anything, either. IMDb Danny DeVito article has no listing for him being in a TV series starting in 1988 by ANY name--Tom Kenny and Jim Cummings articles have nothing relevant either. According to User:Ryanasaurus007, supposed local PBS show in his brain. Niteowlneils 22:36, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Imaginary patent nonsense: delete. &mdash;tregoweth 23:36, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * keep &mdash;Ryanasaurus007 23:46, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Likely not an innocent mistake.  Prank is much, much more likely.  More like this and we should begin taking a very stern look at all contribs. Geogre 02:37, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I have looked at several other of his edits, and so far they are accurate, just some typical newcomer formatting issues. For example, everything at ETP-TV checks out. Niteowlneils 22:37, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Dang it, Three Bears and a New Baby edit didn't check out. Guess we have another 'mixed bag' pnoddy-esque contrib. Niteowlneils 22:49, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * OK, I've checked everything thru 22:18, 13 Nov 2004. Definately hit and miss, but generally seems to be in good faith. Niteowlneils 23:21, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Kind speech to the youngster on his talk page, then? I suppose the Angry Dog mania is just mistaken?  Three in a row, though....  I don't know how we can assume good faith.  The Late Night thing might be a mistake for Triumph, and the TV show could be a mistake for something entirely different, but that means very irresponsible editing at the least. Geogre 01:18, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence this exists. &mdash; mendel &#9742; 02:53, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, and consider all edits by Ryanasaurus007 suspect. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:20, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Also note that Pokémon was not released in Japan until 1996, thus the inclusion of a character named "Pikachu" in 1989 is very very suspect. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:23, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, patent nonsense, I consider it a candidate for speedy deletion. Elf-friend 07:05, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The show does not exist. --*drew 07:07, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. Jayjg 12:16, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. GRider 21:45, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Ryanasaur confuses me... he lists TV shows on his talk page, mostly childrens shows but some don't seem to be real and others just don't fit the catagory (like Inuyasha).  I have serious doubts that this user is 12, but I want to assume good faith.  He's certainly creative.  --L33tminion | (talk) 06:16, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, see my comment above. Alphax (talk) 05:14, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.