Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry Lamb Studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Angry Lamb Studios

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining speedy; taking to AfD because none of the ghits suggest notability to me, but I'm not good with music - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * DELETE No notability. Lambmeat (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete all of the articles created by User:Jsf8336 for WP:N, WP:COI, and WP:MUSIC, and their talk pages. The articles' subjects appear to include his studios (Angry Lamb Studios), and his one-man band (Nature of City (band)).  Already deleted are his articles on himself (Josh Pillbox), his publishing company (Pickled Pepper Publishing), his record company (Secks Records), and two articles related to his record company List of current Secks Records artists and List of former Secks Records artists.    — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 23:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Sacrifice it in the name of WP:CSD. Although the pro-tools plug in list is impressive, I bet Rick Rubin wishes he had half of those to demonstrate notability. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above. South Bay    (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Article has been completely rewritten. Please review As a newcomer to wiki, I now understand why all of my articles were and are about to be deleted. I now see what I was doing was entering items into wikipedia as if it were a directory, not an encyclopedia. However, I have made drastic changes to my Angry Lamb Studios article and truly feel the new information is notable. Of course, I am at the mercy of the community. Either way, please give me tips so I can get it right. Jsf8336 (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - This should have been speedily deleted in the first place as it has no sources, nothing to back up its notability, and sounds like an ad.  GraYoshi2x► talk 01:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Source is listed I did post a source. It is from a magazine article that was written about the studio. Please look at it and explain to me why or why not it is acceptable so I don't make this mistake again in the future. Jsf8336 (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also I saw an article about Ty Fyffe that has no sources either. Can someone explain to me why that is acceptable and my page with a source is not? Thanks! Jsf8336 (talk)
 * I'm pretty sure the article you just mentioned qualifies for a speedy deletion. Just because page x isn't listed for deletion does not mean article y can be kept. People obviously just haven't noticed it yet.  GraYoshi2x► talk 01:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See also WP:OTHERSTUFF. There are lots of articles on WP that shouldn't be - most of those make their way to the deletion process eventually.  MuffledThud (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - still doesn't show notability following re-write, though it is less spammy now. MuffledThud (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.