Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry dad (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  14:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Angry dad (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

According to WP:2DAB, this type of disambiguation page is unnecessary, since neither one of the articles is the primary topic. Both of the links are for related episodes of The Simpsons, and only one of them contains the title "Angry Dad". The recommended practice in these situations, is to place a hatnote on both articles, each one directing people to the other article. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete, I concur and this disambig is not very notable, how many things are we going to find here that are called angry dad? delete the disambiguation page and hatnote the articles-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  14:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * both articles are hat noted now, all we need to do now is wait for the angry dad disambig to be deleted-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  14:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unnecessary disambiguation page where disambiguation is easily accomplished using hatnotes. It is worth noting that a prod was contested on this page. Since the two pages now have hatnotes on them, I wonder if we can invoke G6 here. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Scorpion removed the hat notes saying they are unecessary as both articles are internally linked to each other already, I think we can still invoke G6 already, (why does that remind me of a song in the charts?) -- Lerd the nerd wiki defender  19:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I have tagged it for G6 and will leave it up to an admin to adjudicate. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have declined the speedy deletion of this article under criterion G6. A proposed deletion was previously contested so speedy deletion would not seem to be uncontroversial in this case. This does not affect this discussion reaching a consensus either for or against deletion and should not be seen as a comment or recommendation for or against either outcome. Thryduulf (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree the speedy should have been declined, but that doesn't change the fact that this dab page is unnecessary, as the disambiguation can easily be achieved by hatnotes. Jenks24 (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.