Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry hands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 04:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Angry hands


A behaviour programme applied in just a few schools in a single education authority borough and, as the article states, rejected by other boroughs, therefore does not seem to meet notability requirements, and more importantly, unlikely to be verifiable by third-party sources. I can only see this being notable if it gets adopted over a wide area and gets covered by newspapers, teaching journals, etc. Failed prod. ~Matticus TC 08:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources cited, no sources to be found, notability not established, they've stopped doing it, and it seems like a pretty lame idea anyways.  Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 10:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources. Only 1 google hit when searched with McKeown and that's not the same person. Bordering on original research. GringoInChile 13:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable. --Ter e nce Ong (C 14:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete that sounds amazingly dumb. Looks unverifiable, nothing on Google that I can find. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.