Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angry white male


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure), as per the affirmative consensus of this decidedly non-angry discussion. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Angry white male

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article just seems have original reseach in it and doesn't exactly explain what it is. Hmrox (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It did exist, and it was a notable political term. The article does need cleanup, since there are POV issues. There always are POV issues, it seems, with racial classifications that attach pejorative adjectives. RayAYang (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The term was, and to some extent still is, a notable term. I agree that the article needs clean up.--  Darth Mike   ( Talk  • Contribs ) 19:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This article has been AFDed before. The result last time was to keep. Here's the archived discussion RayAYang (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * keep If the nominator actually read the article I am not sure how they could have come to the conclusion that the article "doesn't exactly explain what it is", when the first sentance reads Angry White Male "is the designation of a voting bloc of white males". And then goes on to describe the characteristics of the said voting bloc. While the current source is not properly noted using inline citations, all the information is laid out in one of the better bibliographic notes that I have seen, showing that it is notalbe and verifiable. It is currently in need of cleanup, but it doesn not meet deletion criteria.-- The Red Pen of Doom  00:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this formerly widely used pop-demographics term (hopefully it is now an artifact of an era). Article needs more sources and inline citations as well as cleanup, but that is normal. --Dhartung | Talk 06:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I AM ONE ANGRY GODAMN MOTHERCUKING WHITE MAN DON'T GODAMN DELETE THIS ARTICLE OR ELSE I'LL VOTE REPUBLICAN! -- see that's what an angry white man sounds like. this is a notable term so lets keep it.MY♥IN chile 06:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per our editing policy. Numerous sources for this exist. Note that it has been at AFD before. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.