Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angus havers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 16:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Angus havers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Clear conflict of interest, completely unusable tone, no reliable sources included, no reliable sources found in my search i kan reed (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject does not appear to be notable. Just to point out, COI is not a justification for deletion. Monty  845  00:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply Well aware of that. It can be a mitigating factor.  AfD is somewhat subjective regardless of how objective we try to make it.  i kan reed (talk) 13:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per Monty845. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 10:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, hard to find reliable sources. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  14:34, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I did find a passing mention in this Times article. However, that is neither significant nor multiple coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I didn't find that. I should have been more careful in my search for sources.  I probably wouldn't have nominated in the first place if I'd found that.  Not good enough to justify withdrawing the nomination, though.  i kan reed (talk) 20:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC.  Gongshow  Talk 06:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.