Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aniela Allotey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Aniela Allotey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Borderline A7 eligible article on a non notable individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus a GNG fail. A before search predominantly search turns up only hits in primary sources and uner generated sources, see here and and here and in mere announcements or mention her in passing see here. Hence ]]WP:SIGCOV]] is definitely not met.. Celestina007 (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * delete as TooSoon; I think @Celestina is right about sources. All I can find (apart from her degree and social-media sites) are copious nearly-identical announcements that she's to become the host of a show (from March this year; to my mind, these count as a single announcement as they probably all stem from the same press release). She may prove notable when she's been in post for a bit, or later in her career, if more people write about what she does, but it hasn't happened yet. Elemimele (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.