Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anika Conolly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Anika Conolly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I know, I know, how dare I nominate another Miss Universe pageant participant page? Well, because people keep writing them. Sure, the subject represents her country. But the Cayman Islands has a little over 56,000 inhabitants, approximately the size of Rocklin, California or Idaho Falls. Do we have articles about Miss Rocklin or Miss Idaho Falls? Of course we don't. Has she won Miss Universe? No, the event hasn't even taken place yet. Do we really need a page for every contestant in an event that hasn't happened yet. No, we don't. Is this article sourced by in-depth, substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources? No, the only source is the angelopedia, which is in no way an independent, reliable source, and should have been blacklisted by now for their spamming efforts. This article fails WP:GNG, fails WP:BIO and only barely scrapes by WP:A7. Please put it out of its misery. Mduvekot (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per the reasons above in the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no notability & no independent reliable sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.