Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Kumar A. V.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 21:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Anil Kumar A. V.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spammer created, notability unclear. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

that's it. none of this supports any of the biographical detail in the article. This ~looks like~ a typical paid editor's work - not that this has anything to do with AfD, which we judge on the article's merits. which are few.
 * Delete | Rewrite The Article somewhat looks notable to me and it qualifies BLP. However, the article must be rewritten in proper manner. Dormantos (talk) 12:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * So let's look at it:
 * source 1 - passing mention
 * source 2 is a review of a book by the subject
 * source 3 is a passing mention
 * source 4 is a mention of a book by the subject, in a list of books.
 * source 5 is a list of his books at a bookseller
 * source 6 same as 5, but even thinner.
 * delete - mostly unsourced; sources do not support WP:NOTABILITY Jytdog (talk) 01:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.