Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal (restaurant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Animal (restaurant)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one review does not make a restaurant Notable. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the reasoning used by the nominator of this article. One review does not make this LA restaurant notable. Given its relatively recent opening, it's hard to see why this restaurant would merit an article of its own. Bmbaker88 (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Restaurants are regularly reviewed in newspapers, that they are reviewed do not make them notable, especially when such establishments are frequently short-lived. Needs sources that cover the restaurant in some depth outside of reviews. Fails WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 09:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of reviews and coverage. desmay (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.