Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Brands

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:15, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Animal Brands
Delete or possibly Merge but I don't think so. Non-encyclopedic. Anything that could be addressed here would be better addressed in brand, animal, symbolism, or on individual product pages, but I don't think it warrants an article on its own. --CVaneg 05:46, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just plain wrong, too, besides the bad grammar which seems to indicate that the creator is not a native English speaker.  No humans are brands?  Betty Crocker?  Aunt Jemima?  Uncle Ben?  Colonel Sanders?  The Quaker Oats Quaker?  RickK 06:14, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inaccurate, nonsense, incoherent. (In addition: Mr. Clean? The Brawny Guy? Ronald McDonald? That creepy new Burger King?) android&harr;talk 06:55, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense. BTW Is Ronald McDonald really human? Dsmdgold 02:52, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete close to patent, but not quite. Fawcett5 21:41, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.