Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal House Shelter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Animal House Shelter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A small animal shelter in suburban Chicago. Nothing I could find other than routine coverage of its existence or of its events ("Dash for Dogs!"), or its mention in the charge and conviction of an employee on sex-offender charges. Calton | Talk 03:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not clear any notability hurdles. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 09:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. Multiple Daily Herald articles and ABC cover the subject in detail. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 13:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I don't think any of these are much good, unfortunately. Both the ABC 7 and Chicago Tribune refs are incidental mentions - these are about the dog race (?) and to massage the Automobile Trade Assc, respectively - and the Daily Herald things strike me as excessively local note-lets. Still, if anything it might be the latter that could make the grade; can't quite assess. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * What "ABC" story? It's a local TV station, not ABC -- and it's not even about the subject itself: you DO understand the differences? --Calton | Talk 23:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, a few passing mentions in a suburban local paper does NOT constitute substantial coverage by any definition. --Calton | Talk 23:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Local, WP:ROTM place. Local coverage not substantive enough for notability. Reywas92Talk 20:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.