Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Kaiser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Animal Kaiser

 * – ( View AfD View log )

After looking for sources, I have been able to determine the game is real but I can not find any indication that independent reliable sources have discussed the game. The current article only describes how to play the game there is no indication of how or if the game is notable. Prod was removed without explanation or improvement. GB fan (talk) 11:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete unless anyone can rewrite and make it notable. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Looks like just another of those schemes for getting as much money as possible out of children, so I am not inclined to ignore the lack of sources in this case. If someone who who is familiar with that stuff were to rewrite it into something resembling a proper article, I might be more inclined to make an exception (would move to weak delete or abstention), but I doubt that it can be done based just on the primary sources.
 * But it appears that there is a huge article about this on the Japanese Wikipedia at ja:百獣大戦アニマルカイザー. Unfortunately it seems to be unsourced. Hans Adler 23:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I have given up trying to find the sources for notability. There are a few news hits from AsiaOne such as Animal Kaiser ensnares parent but I couldn't find a second reliable source. I expect at some point it will be given a formal English language release and be renamed. At that point the article can probably be recreated.Tetron76 (talk) 15:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.