Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Scream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Animal Scream

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:NBAND. Available sources are actually about 1,2,3 band and the association of their band members with this newly formed band. Notability, if exists, can not be inherited. Hitro talk 05:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Majority of source are about Animal Scream directly. I didn't even add any sources about 1,2,3 until this was flagged this for deletion. — comment added by StripedCucumberBeetle (talk • contribs) 20:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 05:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 05:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It seems that 1, 2, 3 is the more notable identity with reviews of their albums in the Guardian and Pitchfork for example. Therefore perhaps this article or a new one should be based mainly on the 123 band with some mention of Animal Scream until they may become more notable when the article can be refocussed. A redirect titled Animal Scream could redirect to the 123 article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

If we're being honest, only difference between getting a review in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Guardian is how much you're willing to pay for a publicist. I fail to see how a paper with over 100 thousand daily subscribers is insignificant press. talk (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:

I've opposed deletion. There's been no real reason given other than certain big newspapers are better than other big newspapers. comment added by StripedCucumberBeetle (talk • contribs) 17:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.