Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal exploitation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Animal exploitation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research; severe NPOV violation. YechielMan 03:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as essay; maybe redirect to animal rights to discourage re-creation. --Allen 04:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "Examples of animal exploitation: sex (i.e. bestiality)". Mmhmm.  Delete as WP:OR.  Lankiveil 11:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong delete. Not only clear WP:OR, but it also sounds like it was put together by an animal rights extremist.  Now, allow me, if you will, to get a nice, thick, juicy steak. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 15:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "This instantiates the design process of Bucky Fuller, applied to the sphere of animal exploitation instead of human emancipation"? You've got to be kidding. Delete rather than redirect, as the (spa) creator has thoughtfully put their website in the edit summary -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  16:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dennis. --Perimosocordiae 19:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POV and WP:NOR Rackabello 20:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete While the subject of this article is an important cultural phenomenon and recognizable neologism that is likely to be well documented. This particular article is biased, uninformative, unclear, and unsourced.  Another possible alternative is to redirect the article to domestication, as "exploit" can also mean "harnessing the potential of".  If I was feeling up to some research I'd probably rework this article.  As the article presently stands, it should be deleted.  i kan reed 21:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This material has been abundantly covered in Animal cruelty, Animal rights, Animal testing... give me ten minutes with a thesaurus and I'm sure I could find half a dozen others. Wysdom 05:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely looks like original research, violating WP:NOR. Dugwiki 19:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.