Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal love (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Animal love
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article doesn't really have any specific information, mostly because the topic is too broad. Anything that might be added here would probably be better directed to more focused articles like Anthrozoology, Zoophilia, Pet or Conservation Movement. Figmentory (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and/or turn into a disambiguation page for the topics the nom mentions. This is the sort of article you can create by just combining random nouns. We'd need sources that identify and cover this as a specific topic. --Chiliad22 (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, with fire. All this talks about is what this could be considered.  Doesn't really explain anything, it's as if it wants to be nebulous.  Replace it with a disambiguation page. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 18:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Especially the useless trivia section. This article contains little information. Even the little bits of information can be put into existing articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.190.0.8 (talk) 02:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.