Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animax Asia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Animax Asia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable "spinoff" or whatever which fails to be verifiable through reliable 3rd party sourcing covering the subject in a non-trivial manner. Content is a virtual mirror of most of the other Animax pages Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Animax only caters Japanese viewers, Animax-Asia caters other Asian countries. If this article gets deleted, I think Animax Hungary should too. E Wing (talk) 09:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Regardless of the Animax Hungary article (which may in fact not be up to standards (I honestly haven't looked yet) If reliable 3rd party sources which cover Animax Asia in a significant manner are found and included in the article than so be it. At present none exist nor have I found anything so far. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm willing to grant that some of what is | here may in fact be significant. Perhaps it should just be a case of restructuring the articles (merging Animax India and Korea and such into Animax Asia & spinning out an Animax Europe article which could incorporate the significant stuff from the Hungary article and the main article. That would take care of the duplication and such and move the group of articles towards a consistency of sorts)Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  treelo  radda  15:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- --  AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 20:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep National cable networks in major countries tend to be notable, and when they span several major countries even moreso. Particularly telling quote from the article itself: "It currently airs across over 28 million households..."  That's notable by any remotely reasonable definition.  The schedule table should go though. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.