Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnimeSuki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus, default to keep. Not a strong enough consensus for deletion, particularly since soruces were brought up toward the end of the debate.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 22:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

AnimeSuki

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:WEB. Unnotable website that has been tagged for notability since March with nothing added. The only two non-primary sources do not mention AnimeSuki at all. It does not have significant coverage in multiple third-party reliable sources. AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:WEB. No evidence of secondary sources verifying notability per the guideline, and the external links on the article go to similar sites. There's not the secondary coverage required. PeterSymonds | talk  16:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:WEB and WP:ORG because it only describes the site's services. There are no truly independent sources which describe any greater significance, such as impact on fan subbing as a community. Xymmax (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Alexa ranking 3286 70.51.9.170 (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Point? AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per the nom. This article does not demonstrate notability per WP:WEB and there is really no place we can merge to. Sasuke9031 (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Fortune states that it is "the largest database of BitTorrent anime shows". . No opinion on this debate though. - Mailer Diablo 03:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep with above mentioned coverage by Mailer Diablo and more extensive coverage by Anime News Network.     --Farix (Talk) 16:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per TheFarix and Mailer diablo. A mention in Fortune is a mention in a non-tech non-anime oriented very mainstream source, and the constant ANN coverage certainly says they think animesuki is notable. --Gwern (contribs) 17:40 11 May 2008 (GMT)
 * Huh. Looks like Gwern's right -- keep per links demonstrating notability. (Wasn't expecting that, to be honest.) —Quasirandom (talk) 22:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.