Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anime Warriors!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  03:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Anime Warriors!
Contested Prod. Unsourced and unlocated fan fiction using anime characters from all over. Google is unhelpful, as the phrase seems to be used by a bunch of websites and gaming clans. Even if we knew where this was, fanfic is not notable. Fan-1967 02:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, fanfiction is not notable per WP:FICT. --TheFarix (Talk) 03:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Do not delete. Page still in development.
 * 'Myalysk 03:28, 2 August 2006
 * If you delete, prepare to face the heat!.
 * Okaidou 03:35, 2 August 2006
 * If you are going to delete this article, you might as well delete Neglected Mario Characters as well, because that also not real (yet).
 * Sunfie-kun 03:41, 2 August 2006
 * I'm looking forward to Anime Warriors!, so don't ruin it for me, or anyone else for that matter.
 * Paparano 03:48, 2 August 2006
 * Me horny
 * Lips|Lips 03:52, 2 August 2006
 * Look! This is serious. Stop playing around! Either you're with us or against us. All in good respect, don't delete this article. Give it a chance to grow. Or else it's like killing off a newborn baby.
 * Sunfie-kun 03:59, 2 August 2006


 * Note All the above entries were added, in the same edit, by User:Myalysk, the author of the article. Fan-1967 04:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This user also has a history of removing AfDs from articles that he works on. --TheFarix (Talk) 13:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment/Aside Looking at this user's contributions and talk page, s/he seems to do an incredible amount of vandalism. How come said user has never been blocked, and has only been warned once? -- Kicking222 17:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It's been talken care of. --TheFarix (Talk) 20:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Exodoun Exodoun
 * Delete, blatantly non-notable fan fiction, fails WP:FICT, WP:WEB for its website, WP:RS for any of its claims of importance. -- Kinu t /c  04:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fanfiction is fanfiction. --Xrblsnggt 06:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Let us brave the wrath of the army of sockpuppets and slay this article! --Brianyoumans 07:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete in a fire and warn the author for his sockpuppetry and AfD removals.  Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  16:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and after weeks with temperatures in the high nineties (Fahrenheit), I'm prepared to face the heat. --DrTorstenHenning 16:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per WP:NN, WP:WEB, probably WP:NFT. Th ε Halo Θ 16:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Fine! Delete it. Just go ahead and ruin my dreams! I frickin' hate you guys!!!!, DAMN!!!!!!!!!! Silver666 Actually by Myalysk 16:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Big  top  18:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fanfic is pretty much inherently not-notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Counterexample Neglected Mario Characters has history and substance, and so might be acceptable, but this article appears to have neither, and its subject isn't even uniquely identified. It was also quite foolish of the article creator to AfD-tag Gilmore Girls in retaliation; I'm sure I'm not the only one watching that article who only discovered this AfD because of this folly. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I know I may be getting off the subject, but what do think of the plot for Anime Warriors anyway? Exodoun
 * It has potential, and it should be interesting to see how you manage to merge stuff as different as Spirited Away (my favourite movie ever) and Pokemon. Also, I hope Jigglypuff is in it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The vast majority of fanfics aren't notable. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about, I didn't create the fanfic.
 * Delete author's history speaks for itself. Danny Lilithborne 21:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete even though plot summary seems cool (really cool).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  21:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  21:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.