Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anime physics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge. -- King of Hearts talk 23:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Anime physics
I see no way that this list of personal opinions can ever become an encyclopedia article. Big Blue Marble 00:54, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, maybe add a note to anime about how the laws of physics in the anime world is different from real world (if there isn't any). &mdash; Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. We have to have some kind of warning left in the article to make sure no one tries to create one again, too. MythSearcher 02:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 02:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry to put it here, I have looked at the cartoon physics page and figured out that if the article could be somehow changed to describing what Anime Physics means (which will be really similar to what the cartoon physics page currently has.) MythSearcher 02:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * If so, then I suggest a merge -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 03:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge to Cartoon physics. No need for this to have a separate article.   dbtfz talk 02:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Dbtfz Bucketsofg 03:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge as it seems to be a better solution. MythSearcher 05:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:OR. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 06:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cartoon physics. J I P  | Talk 09:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cartoon physics. This actually made me doubt about if we shouldnt remove Cartoon physics too. The references used in Cartoon physics are not that trustworthy, honestly. - The preceding signed comment was added by Nazgjunk (talk • contrib} 10:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cartoon physics. --Ter e nce Ong 10:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cartoon physics, which is a bloody damn great article. I highly recommend the principles of Anvilology. Eusebeus 10:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and rewrite, should not stand alone Celcius 13:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cartoon physics and get rid of stuff that doesn't actually have to do with physics!!! BD2412  T 14:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cartoon physics. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as above, we already have a perfectly good article for this. ProhibitOnions 16:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * merge per above and keep cartoon physics around, It's a freakin cool article. Culturally significant. -- Dragoonmac - If there was a problem yo I'll solve it 23:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Merge per everyone else. -Haon 01:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with Cartoon Physics. I originally made it as a section of Cartoon Physics, and it was later split off by someone else who felt that it was getting too big.  I trimmed it down a little more, now.  SAMAS 31 March 2006.
 * Merge to Cartoon physics and cleanup. --MaNeMeBasat 07:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.