Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animexx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn per WP:SNOW. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 12:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Animexx

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable website. Fails WP:WEB and WP:N. A single reliable source noting its existence is not enough to establish actual notability. CSD removed by non-admin with note of "(removed speedy, notability asserted by http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/literatur/0,1518,516148,00.html > take to WP:AFD if you wish to pursue deletion" -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 21:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — --  AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 21:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:WEB and WP:N. In addition to this article from Der Spiegel, there are more sources in this Google News Archive search. This article from Deutschland discusses Animexx in one paragraph. Using Google Translate, I discovered that "[t]he biggest manga portal in German-speaking countries is Animexx." Furthermore, this article from Saarländischer Rundfunk provides two paragraphs of information about Animexx. According to Google Translate, the article says that people from nearly 700 countries are members of this website. Cunard (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:WEB. In addition to the ones called out above, there are several other substantive G-news hits from equally mainstream media (and they don't get more mainstream than Der Spiegel -- that's like a profile in Time). The machine translations described above are substantially correct, by my reading with admittedly rusty German. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The evidences of notability are strong enough to warrant an article in wikipedia. Back in the context to get mentioned on an article on animanga from publication like the Der Spiegel is not small feat as such article were and still be few and far between in those medium. --KrebMarkt 06:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cunard. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.