Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animorphs (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. I've created a subsection in the main article and will redirect this there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Animorphs (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mostly speculation and rumours, seems like WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON Melcous (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no indication that the movie is happening, only speculation that it could happen and the speculation has not received significant coverage. No longer a penguin (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. WP:CRYSTAL applies here. Some movies that aren't released do get their own article (Avengers:Infinity War) but this isn't confirmed, much less notable speculation. The Platypus of Doom (talk) 11:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per consisting mostly "citiations", which are actually rumors and redirects, to prove that it exists, applies WP:CRYSTAL.  NasssaNser  Talk  13:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for now per failing WP:NFF. While there is probably enough in sources to support in articles of Sony and Universal a sourced mention of it "being planned", it is definitely TOO SOON for its own article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed with the above reasons. Both WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON apply here. Aoba47 (talk) 20:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete CRYSTAL, TOOSOON and a good helping of WP:FANCRUFT as the article is literally only sourced to both OR and a long-become disinterested fanblogger who just checked WHOIS and made observations about website ownership.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is some mild coverage of the film rumors, so there might be merit in starting an adaptation section in the book series article that would contain this information. There's already a TV series, so there's already reason to have an adaptation section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I created the adaptation section, but I couldn't find anything in a RS about the Sony website rumors. They're on various blogs and other SPS, but not in anything Wikipedia would consider reliable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.