Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anion bulbs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Air ioniser. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Anion bulbs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article where the content doesn't seem to address the title at all. Instead appears to be vaguely promotional about the health benefits of anions. All of which is unreferenced and can be read as pseudo-science. NtheP (talk) 07:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Air ioniser, which this appears to be an example of. The content is not suitable for merging because it is unverifiable, a google search finds nothing reliable, and certainly nothing meeting the standards of WP:MEDRS. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 10:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. 02:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.