Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anisa Romero (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Anisa Romero
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable musician/artist, can't find any in depth coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 17:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Seems like this would even qualify for speedy deletion under criterion A7 (no indication of importance). Colin M (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this should have been speedy deleted. All I can find online is that she is "Assistant Director of Facilities and Administration at NYU Tisch School of the Arts." Non-notable.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 08:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No statement of notability and a clear attempt at creating a directory-style entry of the type better left at LinkedIn and similar services. Wikipedia is not a directory. Meanwhile, her works have received no reliable media coverage and has only been noticed in a few blogs and routine listings. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above, no notability, no real coverage. 12:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Alex-h (talk)
 * Redirect to Sky Cries Mary. Being a lead singer of a notable band is a clear and solid statement of notability. The grossly bad form act of removing the prime claim of notability just before nomination is almost grounds to call for a procedural speedy keep, especially given that none of the above who are calling for delete show any sign of having done a good Before, look at the history of the article. All appear to be purely judging the subject on the current state of the article instead of the notability of the subject. Do not delete and severely trout the nominator. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * just to be a little pedantic the removed text you're referring to reads During the 1990s, she sang with Roderick Wolgamott of Sky Cries Mary and lead vocals for Hana. It did not say she was actually a member of Sky Cries Mary. That removed sentence, even if verifiable, would not be grounds for notability. (That said, after some more searching, I can believe she is/was a member based on sources like )
 * Also, do you have a source for the claim that "Being a lead singer of a notable band is a clear and solid statement of notability". My reading of WP:BAND suggests this is not true, based on the quote Note that members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases. and on this portion of notability criterion 6: or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles (which suggests to me that being a member of one notable ensemble does not establish a musician as being independently notable). Colin M (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.