Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aniseed twist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Anise.  Sandstein  20:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Aniseed twist

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Definitely exists, but my WP:Before search only found listings in candy shops rather than any sizable articles on the history and significance of this sugary treat. Coin945 (talk) 11:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - I failed to find how this candy qualifies for inclusion aside from mere existing. It's not mentioned significantly in any cookbooks, candy history books, history books, or online media/sources outside of shops where you can buy it. I suggest merging, anything of value (even passing mention?), to Anise OR List_of_candies as an WP:Alternative to deletion. Missvain (talk) 15:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per Missvain, though my preference would actually to create List of British confectionary and merge it there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.