Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anisha Kauldher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  14:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Anisha Kauldher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. News search gives me nothing on google Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 04:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Searching "Miss Quesnel Anisha Kauldher" in news gives notable evidence from the official website of the City of Quesnel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gizmobar (talk • contribs) 05:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Parochial town pageantry, the standard is at least country level (e.g. Miss Canada). Brandmeistertalk  14:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject has met notability standards and is reliable as per secondary sources cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gizmobar (talk • contribs) 14:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong delete None of the sources are even vaguely independent. If it was a local newspaper, it would be at least somewhat independent. Here all the sources are the city's own website, intent on promoting the beauty pageant to advance the town. This is way below the threshold of notability for beauty pageant winners by any measure.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Article has now sources from Quesnel Observer Newspaper. News archive available: http://www.quesnelmuseum.ca/COA/2008/20080727_Cariboo%20Observer_2.pdf#xml=http://www.quesnelmuseum.ca/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getpdfhits&u=1a656e14&DocId=19511&Index=%2ac2c60acda53c67736efc2e79b9d8ff9f&HitCount=10&hits=b4c+b9a+b9b+c3c+c3d+e0f+e29+e2a+e6f+e70+&SearchForm=E%3a%5cRoles%5cWeb%5cMuseum%20WWW%5ccaribooobserver%5fform%2ehtml&.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tr0nx (talk • contribs) 03:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject does not meet notability requirements outlined in WP:BIO.  Sources are at best routine small-town local news stories.  Deli nk (talk) 16:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of substantial in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Rentier (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Winning a beauty pageant at the local level in a town of 10K is not a notability claim that gets somebody into an international encyclopedia, and purely local coverage in that same town's local pennysaver does not confer a WP:GNG pass — if that type of sourcing were sufficient in and of itself, we'd have to start keeping articles about presidents of church bake sale committees and winners of high school poetry contests. There'd be a case for notability because media coverage if that coverage were coming from the likes of The Globe and Mail, but not if the Quesnel Observer is the best you can do. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.