Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita M. Samuels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Anita M. Samuels

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability: all available sources seem to either her own articles or blurbs accompanying them.  DGG ( talk ) 18:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Send to draft Weak delete This was just created today and I'd rather give the creator a bit more time to locate sources. I just went through four pages of search results with her byline in the NY Times, so I'm somewhat hopeful that sources can be found. If not, then it can be dealt with at AfC. LaMona (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (interview)  20:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, I added a few references that I found, but it's tough to find information for journalists. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ditto. I've searched high and low. I can find literally hundreds of articles by her, but none about her. One site says she won an award from "National Association of Black Journalists" but their site doesn't show it. I found her articles cited in court decisions. But nothing really about her. I'm afraid I have to change my vote! although I still feel that the problem may be not having the right sources. LaMona (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for now at best as I also considered draft and userfy but delete for now perhaps altogether until better is available. SwisterTwister   talk  23:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.