Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Romaniuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Anita Romaniuk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person whose sole claim of notability is having served on a municipal parks and recreation board — which is not a claim of notability that satisfies WP:NPOL. While Vancouver is in the narrow range of cities for which we do extend notability to the members of Vancouver City Council, that doesn't extend to lower offices like its school board or its parks board — normally, a person on the lower bodies only qualifies for an article if they have previously or subsequently held a more notable office, such as the main city council or a seat in the provincial legislature. Otherwise, you'd have to source her past WP:GNG, but the only reference here is an election results page which doesn't even actually have her name in it anymore, because it's since been updated to list the results of the 2011 municipal election instead of the earlier one that she actually ran in — so it would have been an invalid primary source even when it did have her name in it, but now it fails to even verify the claim of notability it's being cited for at all. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if she ever actually wins election to an office that actually passes WP:NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Wait, so Leslie Knope gets an article but Romaniuk doesn't? Seems harsh. Delete as per nom, not yet notable enough for inclusion, not until she wins a higher-level office anyway. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete An elected parks commissioner does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:15, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.