Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Silwal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Anita Silwal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This undisclosed WP:PAID/WP:COI article's subject does not appear to be notable. My first attempt was to clean up the article but I soon realised that there is almost nothing worth retaining: unsourced, poorly sourced, and material that would be WP:UNDUE in any biography, cover more or less the whole of the article. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NJOURNALIST, fails WP:NACTOR, and the core content policies WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV, aside from the almost certain violaton of the terms of use with WP:UPE. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Probably in G11 territory, and fails WP:BIO anyways. I have no problems if this is nuked as G11, but given the UPE going on here, raising the likelihood of multiple recreations, I'd like to see the higher bar imposed by WP:G4 to prevent more time from being spent on dealing with paid-for spam here in the future.  Java Hurricane  07:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree that this probably could be G11-ed as this is straight up spam. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.