Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjali Mukerjee (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Anjali Mukerjee
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Time for the fourth AFD, I guess. This is in dire need of WP:TNT - created by yet another paid editor in violation of the TOS, this is nothing more than a massive fluff piece. See past afds: 1, 2, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anjali_Mukerjee_Health_Total_Pvt._Ltd. 3]. I redacted my original statement that TNT was appropriate. I think deleting entirely and salting is more appropriate as there is no evidence she is notable despite claims she is "well known" the fact that there are 68+ sources in this article and none of them are independent, in depth or reliable, combined with virtually no useful sources in my WP:BEFORE leads me to believe that not only is this typical WP:PAID editing but they've attempted to pad her "resume" with nonsense sources ands he is not actually notable. Praxidicae (talk) 19:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll also note that I've assessed the sources on the talk page and am currently finishing all 68 of them. Praxidicae (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete this is advertising; should be salted. Britishfinance (talk) 17:09, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom clearly advertising.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete it's blatant advertising, highly POV article that when cut down to the bare bones probably isn't notable. Given the full history, WP:TNT at a minimum, but delete and salt just to get to the near certain end result.  Ravensfire  (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt-Per all above. &#x222F; WBG converse 10:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.