Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjali ramkissoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Anjali ramkissoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article falls under WP:BLP1E. The doctor was caught on video berating an Uber driver, and while being covered, the event is a single event that does not show notability. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom - I'm seeing plenty of coverage, but the event itself will probably have no real notable aftermath (driver apparently didn't even want to press charges), and the subject "is likely to remain... a low-profile individual." GABHello! 19:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. If there's a page about this incident at all, i'd suggest a page about the incident itself, not someone involved, but I don't think its notable enough for that Sheepythemouse (talk) 20:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Another case of Wikipedia is not news.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing suggesting better longtime independent notability for a better article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article appears to meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the history to revert to. See CSD G10. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Escd5 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.