Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjou Interchange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Anjou Interchange

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Well, the obvious concern is notability: Wikipedia is not just a repository of information (even true, and arguably useful one). I completely ascribe to Floydian's arguments in that similar AfD (same creator, BTW). I would have redirected, but the interchange is not mentioned there. Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This article and Décarie Interchange are not by the same creator -- please recheck the edit histories. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Sorry about that. I cannot remember how I came to think of that.
 * In my defense, User_talk:BT101 already had two PROD notices when I nominated. Something must have shortcircuited in my mind. Tigraan Click here to contact me 17:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I doubt an interchange is coveraged by WP:GEOLAND, is it? There were some vague mentions of the interchange to be found on less reputable sites but no coverage focusing on the interchange itself, other than a few Youtube videos possibly. Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * You'd best search for it under its French name (esp. as it's an east-end interchange; Montreal island has a more anglo west side). Here's the Gnews results for that. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GEOROAD. Regardless of the traffic volume, it doesn't meet GNG, in either language. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete We don't need a stub on every single non-notable feature. Is there any redirect target by any chance - like is list or something? If yes, then I am OK with a redirect. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, Quebec_Autoroute_25 or Quebec_Autoroute_40 could do, but as those articles stand, either would be a WP:SURPRISE for the reader. Tigraan Click here to contact me 17:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah I see. In that case, I guess deleting is best. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, legend says that it is possible to edit other articles to make them suitable redirect targets. We could do that, too. But I am not sure how to do it, and I doubt it is worth it. Tigraan Click here to contact me 18:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * As you can see from Articles for deletion/Décarie Interchange, Décarie Interchange was simply turned into a redirect to Quebec Autoroute 40. I think that was the wrong outcome, since the eponymous "Autoroute Décarie" is a section within Quebec Autoroute 15. If I cared enough to wade into that I'd probably change it. When two provincial highways meet in an interchange, redirecting to just one of them doesn't make a whole lot of sense imo -- as the Decarie Afd unintentionally shows, I'd say. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.