Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjou Soares


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Anjou Soares

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in WP:RS. Fails our guidelines per WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  17:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep because he was a high-level Christian priest of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Karachi per   and other refs in the article.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 06:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You are linking what I searched before nominating. We don't have enough coverage in WP:RS to write without WP:OR per WP:GNG. Störm   (talk)  18:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:BASIC. Note that he was CEO of a Diocese, not the Bishop. We keep Bishops even as stubs, with a diocesan administrator, we need sources. I ran some news archive searches, and failed to find anything.  Mar4d, if you can source it, ping me to revisit.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I am dubious as to whether a diocesan administrator is a high enough post to be notable without more. He may have been the bishop's right hand man, but he was not a bishop.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, not a bishop, just a priest with an administrative posting. He would need coverage that meets GNG standards beyond just the routine of doing his job here, which we don't have. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.