Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anju Mahendru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 13:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Anju Mahendru
I saw this while doing New Page patrol. I'm unsure whether she is notable enough for Wikipedia. 893 Google hits, Bollywood star with IMDB page. No vote Ter e nce Ong 13:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems notable enough: PJM 14:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, IMDB profile definitely means notable. --Ter e nce Ong 14:44, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable Bollywood star -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 15:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, having an IMDB page usually confers notability.   Proto    ||    type    15:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It has been whittled down to a workable stub that could easily be expanded in the future as she is a leading name in Bollywood. Keresaspa 15:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per this filmography or the IMDb one. She's had credited roles in enough notable Bollywood films to be on here.  She seems to have few or no leads, but being in 30 Bollywood films certainly clears the bar. --Deville (Talk) 16:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, she's definitely real and notable. (And real notable.) ProhibitOnions 16:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Film and TV career spanning four decades and dozens of roles. Is that isn't notable, what is?  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.