Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjunabeats Worldwide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ged UK  12:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Anjunabeats Worldwide

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG. advert for self-published, no assertion of notability. (Part of promo / COI cleanup.) Widefox ; talk 09:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. If this were only on internet radio I would say delete, but the satellite radio broadcast on Sirius means it reaches a sufficiently wide audience to be notable. Lack of sources in the article isn't grounds for deletion if sources do exist, and my opinion is that the listing of scheduled broadcast times is an "assertion of notability." Roches (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Understand where you're coming from in broad terms. In terms of policy/guidelines notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from Sirius XM Radio. (We can redirect to there.) Widefox ; talk 17:39, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG and no claim of notability. Article is totally dependent on primary sources. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above and the many problems listed on said page, which I cannot see disappearing any time soon due to a lack of reliable secondary and tertiary sources. - HyperGaruda (talk) 15:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.