Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjunabeats Worldwide 07


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 02:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Anjunabeats Worldwide 07

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:NALBUM; only reviews available are crowdsourced (Amazon). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep This article counts as a album stub with "Start-class", as it was released quite recently and can be further edited and added on to. Websites commenting on its release can be written in the near future, which will provide a suitable benchmark for album reviews. aNode   (discuss)  11:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment It's strange to know that this was the only article for deletion which was brought up. When I wrote this article, I formulated it to be exactly the same to previous album pages for the Anjunabeats Worldwide series, which are as seen here: Anjunabeats Worldwide 03 and Anjunabeats Worldwide 04. (The one I wrote might have even more information than these two pages, as I mentioned about the tour which came with the album's release!) Yet mine was the only one AFDed and these articles still stand. Thus if this article was to be deleted, the other ones mentioned too should be AFDed. I don't believe for album music stubs to be deleted, as its format was mentioned here on the Wikiproject Album page and there are methods stated to help expand the article in the table. (Editors should place a stub template at the bottom of the article, just above the categories. Focus should be on expanding the lead section, adding an infobox, and fleshing out the basic details of the album.) aNode   (discuss)  11:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * a) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; following policy, I would suggest that the above articles should go to AfD as well, and based on the outcome of this discussion, I may nominate them.
 * b) None of the above absolves the article subject from the requirement of demonstrating notability in the form of charting or reviews; that holds for stubs as much as for more developed articles. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, I guess your point makes sense for (a). But my main point still stands for (b), where notability may not be demonstrated right now, but in the future there may be significant coverage for the topic subject. aNode   (discuss)  13:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * But we don't really pitch on that count - for the reason that it would more or less obviate any notability criteria if you could say "but this might become notable in the future". We decide on current notability, and current notability only. There's nothing stopping you from keeping this article (or those articles) in draft space, pending future sufficient coverage, but until that is shown, it should not be in article space. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 23:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails N - at first glance the article looks like an directory listing - no encyclopedic content, more like an ad for the album. Atsme 📞📧 17:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 01:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.