Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Manori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Uttarakhand cricketers. North America1000 03:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Ankit Manori

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails NSPORT/GNG due to lack of significant coverage. WP:SPORTBASIC requires at least one SIGCOV source to be present in the article. –dlthewave ☎ 19:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket,  and India. –dlthewave ☎ 19:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:CRIN. StAnselm (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That is not a valid argument here. CRIN is a wikiproject essay which does not offer any presumption of notability. The relevant SNG is NCRIC, and since the subject fails this, sources need to be found to show that GNG is met. wjematherplease leave a message... 21:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understand how AfD works. Anyone is allowed to appeal to a notability essay. That's always been the case. See also: WP:ONLYESSAY. StAnselm (talk) 02:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * However, the criteria you are (presumably) relying on here were rejected by the community in a well attended RFC (WP:NSPORTS2022), hence their removal from the actual guideline just a few months ago. You are simply highlighting that the cricket project essay has yet to be updated in line with community consensus. Also, please refer to WP:ATA with regards to making vague wave/just notable !votes. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete/Redirect to List of Uttarakhand cricketers I'm not seeing enough for a GNG pass here, despite the confusion over the spelling of his name, with CA suggesting Ankit Manor and Cricinfo suggesting Ankit Manori, however with both and previous on Indian cricketers who've played a few games, not really seeing enough. I would suggest redirect per WP:ATD, but the list page would need to be created, but perhaps that can be done before the AfD process is complete. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The list is quite short in this case (51 players per CA). Usually I'd do it, but I'll be away from the machine I can easily access CA on for a week, so it couldn't happen before 8 August at the earliest. This is, though, the best alternative in this case and the list could be created as an incomplete list - this has happened before and can work as a placeholder until someone with CA access can get to the list. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect per RugbyFan.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect. This seems the most logical step. His career to date hasn't set the world on fire and I doubt there will be in depth coverage in Hindi sources. StickyWicket (talk) 23:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of a valid redirect target; otherwise redirect. Clearly fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The list is done now. It saved me listening to two family members arguing again... Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * And I should say that this is obviously going to be a non-destructive redirect. That way if we ever get a pile of sources on him the article is much easier to write. I'd prefer that a short note was added to the list when the article is redirected - I'm happy to do it if someone pings me. Ta. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect As per Rugbyfan22. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.