Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Singh (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Ankit Singh (writer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable author/blogger. Has not received any press and the only notable reference is the one from Rajasthan Patrika, which happens to be a screengrab of a poem submitted by the said person. Fails WP:GNG  Jupitus Smart  18:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  18:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  18:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Notability of an article's subject is usually determined by verifiable evidence of notability. How can one determine which sources to consider when determining the notability of a subject? We search for the subject on a search engine and then we get links to them. Some is by local level media and some by other independent sources. Then what should we do? I personally know people who are notable at local level but lack so called verifiable evidence and don't have Wikipedia articles on that subject. And, also I have encountered various articles on Wikipedia itself where a single reference determines their notability. Please clarify on the above point. Regarding the article, it is upto you and the other users/editors to determine if it meets criteria or not. I am NO ONE to suggest to keep it or delete. Thanks Sentiments777 (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * delete after spending a few minutes, it is evident that the subject fails WP:AUTHOR, and WP:GNG as well. — usernamekiran (talk)
 * the answers to your queries can be found at WP:reliable sources. There are also certain cases where the subject is de-facto notable, like a census town (doesnt matter what the population is, if it exists, and can be verified then it should have an article). Certain elected persons are de-facto notable as well. In Indian terminology, all MPs, and MLA's are notable. Only one reliable source stating that they are/were elected is more than sufficient for having an article. If you have further questions, please feel free to ask me on my talkpage. Regards, — usernamekiran (talk)  05:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, fails WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above.  HighKing++ 19:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.