Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann-Karin Müller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 03:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Ann-Karin Müller

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:NBIO huge problems; little reliable sources or general notability of the person. Morpho achilles (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism,  and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: The name is wrong. Ann-Katrin Müller (note the t in Katrin) is the editor for Der Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/impressum/autor-67c446b9-0001-0003-0000-000000018273. Vexations (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. You find nothing if you search using her incorrect name, as the article does. If you use the correct name, you'll see she is a famous journalist. Also she won a notable award, giving her a clear pass at WP:ANYBIO. There is also news about her, criticising her reporting, but I could not tell if it was tabloid, so didn't add it in, in the context of the ANYBIO pass being clear. Her work is frequently cited if you search for her correct name in Google Books. This article was in poor shape, I assume someone machine translated it from German. I've tidied it up, editing most of it. CT55555 (talk) 02:12, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy move. It seems very wrong to keep this page with the incorrect spelling of her name while it's being considered for deletion. Is it not possible to move this page to the correct spelling of her name, and delete the spelling error once and for all, so we don't perpetuate the mistake? And then resume consideration of whether or not it should be deleted? Cielquiparle (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I do agree that the spelling error is increasing the likelihood of people incorrectly reaching conclusions. User:Bookworm857158367, I wonder if you'd have voted differently if you saw the analysis that followed your vote?
 * I hope the closer will take this into consideration. CT55555 (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If she’s the editor of a major publication, she would be notable. The error ought to be corrected. However, editors on the article should have verified that name before it got to this stage. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 17:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * She's not the editor-in-chief, so doesn't get the WP:NACADEMIC #8 pass, but I think she gets the WP:ANYBIO pass for the award. CT55555 (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Please decide first if you want to keep the Articel about Ann-Katrin Müller. Than it is easy to move teh Articel to the right spelling. Thanks. --Samba Olek (talk) 15:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and move as we need to get rid of the misspelling problem ASAP, which in itself is a type of BLP issue. To the AfD closer, I would request:
 * Please close this AfD ASAP, with whatever the appropriate outcome is
 * If the article is kept in some form, please move the article to the correct spelling Ann-Katrin Müller ASAP rather than waiting for someone else to do it

Thank you. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes criteria 1 of WP:ANYBIO and criteria 4 of WP:JOURNALIST as a recipient of the Axel-Springer-Preis. I moved the article to the correct title.4meter4 (talk) 21:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I wasn't sure it was allowed per the AfD rules in the middle of an AfD discussion, otherwise I would have done it earlier myself. I think the process itself needs some kind of escape button when things go wrong like this. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep if she is the political editor of the largest German magazine, how is that not notable? Trillfendi (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep the article which appears under the correct name now and which has improved in several other important ways since it was first nominated for deletion; we're no longer voting on the viability of the page with the misspelling which should never have been created in the first place and probably should not have passed page triage either (?). Cielquiparle (talk) 21:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.