Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann (Taiwanese singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 06:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Ann (Taiwanese singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No secondary sources fails WP:MUSIC. (PROD removed without providing a source.) Widefox ; talk 01:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim to anything notable in the article and no sources. How do you even look for sources for someone known only by one of the most common first names for women in the English language? -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 15:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)




 *  Comment — leaning toward keep. According to the Chinese Wikipedia article, she was a finalist for a Golden Melody Award for new artist, and won a similar award in Singapore.  I cannot verify the Golden Melody finalist status right now (official governmental Web site is inaccessible at the moment, perhaps due to international bandwidth issues, which is not uncommon), but the Chinese Wikipedia article is detailed enough that it appears to show notability and does not appear to be a hoax.  It is also consistent with the Chinese Wikipedia article on the new artist category at Golden Melody.  (See zh:最佳新人獎 (金曲獎).)  --Nlu (talk) 03:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Governmental site is still inaccessible, but there are plenty of news articles out there confirming status. See, e.g., .  The Google search to verify this would be for 金曲獎 and 白安.  --Nlu (talk) 03:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.