Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Beretta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus (NPASR). While I am unconvinced the sources listed and suggested currently satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN, I am going ahead to close this discussion as No consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 15:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Ann Beretta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A music band and their albums. No indication of notability per WP:GNG, no references to any coverage in reliable sources. See Articles for deletion/The Other Side of the Coin where one of their albums was already deleted.  Sandstein  10:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 10:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 10:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 10:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment No sources cited in the article are a problem, but I found some minor punk-scene coverage/reviews and local press. Might be more press that's not searchable on the internet. I may have some in my old files (full disclosure: This was a band my company did business with back in the day) but not sure if I have the time or inclination to root around for it during this busy holiday season. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the band, "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." No opinion on the album articles. Geschichte (talk) 19:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep the band article. Multiple coverage in sources we've generally recognized for band notability such as PopMatters, PunkNews.org , Austin Chronicle . The band seems to have achieved a lasting notability beyond its local fame in Richmond, and enough coverage to support an article. If the album articles don't turn up enough sources, they should be redirected to the band article rather than deleted. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.