Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Burbrook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 00:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Ann Burbrook


No notability. Her most known role is in Blue Heelers? This utterly fails WP:BIO. Diez2 03:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 03:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep she had a "major role" on one of the longest running Aussie shows. But, I'm not Australian, I have never seen Blue Heelers (till I looked at the Wiki link) and she doesn't seem all that notable. But..perhaps to an Australian she might be? :) Missvain 04:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. I think her credentials add up to notability. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep No problems satisfying WP:BIO. Note, nominator possibly should not be querying about "Blue Heelers?", as the show is indeed a major Australian TV Show. Ans e ll  07:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The biography linked to by the article points a fairly substantial TV and movie acting career . Not that it matters but Blue Heelers made it to this side of the world too. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  08:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, at least marginally notable. Everyking 08:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Valrith 16:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep due to prominent role in major TV series. Mallanox 19:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets criteria of WP:BIO, has more than a few credited roles, and prominence on Aussie tv should count as much as prominence on any other country's television programming. Agent 86 20:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Blue Heelers was the most popular show on Australian television in the mid-1990s so she is notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 02:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- notable enough for inclusion. - Longhair\talk 04:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per arguments above. QazPlm 00:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it was an awful show, but also very popular, and she had a major part in it for a few years. Lankiveil 00:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC).
 * Keep per the above--cj | talk 05:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, "utterly" passes WP:BIO as an Australian actress in film and highly popular TV series. The nominator's questioning of the notability of Blue Heelers also concerns me - I'm sure this was done in the best faith, but one has to be careful not to define "non-notable" as "I've never heard of it". --Canley 09:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty notable, although expansion to encyclopedic length would be advisable.   Markovich292  05:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.