Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Katherine Storer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Ann Katherine Storer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability -- very minor historical significance if any  DGG ( talk ) 11:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - Her potential notability is as a planter and slaveowner. Being the only woman to be appointed as a receiver in Chancery and the only case of holding a joint appointment could possibly constitute notability.  However I take planters (who inevitably owned slaves) to be the equivalent of farmers in other countries, who (other things apart) are inherently NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:54, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment The Centre for the Study of the Legacies of British Slave-ownership reference may constitute WP:SIGCOV and the Centre has identified her as a "person of interest" briefly describing her as: "Jamaican-born widow of a prominent slave-owner; resident in Britain following the death of her husband in 1818. Accused - and acquitted - of the cruel treatment of some enslaved people whom she brought to Britain with her." . Ideally, I would like to see at least one more secondary RS source. 24.151.50.175 (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough sourcing to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 18:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Nom and John Pack Lambert. If someone finds more reliable sourcing to advance the historical significance please ping me. Otr500 (talk) 14:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.