Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann L. Kim

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Rob Church Talk 00:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Ann L. Kim
Delete - non-notable biography, no response to requests for explanation of notability after 16 days, google test brings up only this article -Werdna648 08:01, 31 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - Worse, the author says the article was made as a personal birthday gift. --rob 11:28, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN DV8 2XL 12:12, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - vanity article with no assertion of notability. Proto t c 14:24, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I think "nationally known" constitutes a claim of notability, thus not fulfilling CSD:A7... Usrnme h8er 17:13, 31 August 2005 (UTC)


 * strong delete vanity... already userfiedRoodog2k 16:29, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity. Usrnme h8er 17:13, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I wish Ann a happy birthday. However, as she is not yet notable enough as a lawyer to warrant an article, I also vote to Delete this article. Capitalistroadster 19:03, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Funnier than most articles of this kind. I wish Ann and Kyster the best and hope that Kyster gets, uh, whatever it is that he was hoping to get out of this. Although reading the Nesting section I have to wonder what she will think and whether perhaps on the whole a dozen long-stemmed roses would be more effective. Note that the article has already been userfied. Dpbsmith (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.