Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann M. Clarke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)    Kadzi    (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Ann M. Clarke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real credible claim of significance or why her research is significant.    Kadzi    (talk) 21:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Her GS citation counts look pretty good for someone who mostly published in the pre-Internet era. Mental Deficiency was an edited collection, but quite a widely-reviewed one . So was the 1976 Early Experience . The 2000 Early Experience was authored, rather than edited, by Clarke and Clarke, and it was also reviewed more than the token amount for an academic book . Being an Honorary Fellow of the British Psychological Society (confirmed here) may also qualify for WP:PROF WP:PROF. I don't have time today for a deeper evaluation, but I'd be inclined to !vote "keep" unless someone had a rather good counterargument. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 23:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's #C3, not #C5, that her honorary fellowship in the BPS would count towards (I can never keep those two straight myself either). In addition to the passes of WP:PROF, #C3, and WP:AUTHOR suggested above, though, she does also pass #C5 by being given a personal chair at Hull (according to the source, the first one given to a woman at that university). —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC).
 * Keep Based on what XOR&#39;easter and David Eppstein have said. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: That Methuen published Readings from Mental Deficiency: The Changing Outlook in their "Methuen's manuals of psychology" "University paperbacks" series looks like C4 of Prof :"4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions." Pam  D  13:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep OK, I think the case has been made, so I'll make my !vote official. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, at the risk of piling on. NAUTHOR, as well as clear NPROF. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Author of notable books (multiple published reviews) as established by sources present in article. pburka (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above all. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Satisfied WP:NPROF Pi (Talk to me!)  18:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.