Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna's Taqueria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Anna's Taqueria

 * Article has been withdrawn by the nominator, who asked me how to do it on my talk page. Everyone commenting said keep.  Non-administrator close.   D r e a m Focus  10:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

The article is essentially a promotion piece for a takeaway establishment. If not deleted entirely, it absolutely should not refer to the company's own menu to 'establish' itself as "inexpensive".-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 09:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Moderate coverage, and a Google Books search indicates that several works of fiction have included mentions of the chain as well. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 17:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bushranger. Agree with the nominator that any claims about the chain (i.e. "inexpensive", "award-winning") must be sourced to secondary reliable sources, or removed if they can't be. 28bytes (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.  Snotty Wong   communicate 17:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - There appears to be plenty of coverage of this business, judging from a Gnews search. If there is a perceived problem with the spammy tone of the article, then in this case it would probably be more constructive to just fix it rather than nominating it for deletion.  Snotty Wong   communicate 17:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Places that sell burritos didn't seem to me to be a particularly notable topic in general and it seemed advertorial, so I decided to raise the AfD. However, I have no strong opinion.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 22:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * What about Taco Bell, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Del Taco, Qdoba Mexican Grill, Taco Del Mar, Taco Time, and every other restaurant listed at Category:Fast-food_Mexican_restaurants?
 * Refer to previous comment.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * To clarify... I raised the AfD because I didn't think the article should be there, but wasn't sure. (This is distinct from either a or a more assertive argument for AfD.) The consensus is clearly to keep, and that's fine.-- Jeffro 77  (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, weakly. Local chains like this can become cultural touchstones, identifying the place and period in which they operate, raising them to encyclopedic significance, or "long term historical" notability.  This would appear to be borderline, but probably has achieved that status. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bushranger and Smerdis. Article is flagged for rescue and there are enough 3d party sources to establish notability. Geoff  Who, me?  17:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Everyone already gave the reasons why. If the nominator no longer believes it should be deleted, and there is no one here saying delete, you can just withdraw the nomination.   D r e a m Focus  15:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SNOW and WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.