Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna.aero (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Aviation Week. Given the ongoing lack of interest in the topic, this ATD is probably the best outcome we're going to get. Star  Mississippi  03:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Anna.aero
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The last AfD was closed as no consensus due to limited participation. As this has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, I really hope we can now get this resolved. It exists, but I couldn't find that sources to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete it's a WP:RS, but there isn't much coverage on the publication itself. feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 07:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  13:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Aviation Week: Defunct website, with little notability found per the sources used. I don't find mentions of them beyond passing mentions. I'd be ok with a selective !merge into the same article. Oaktree b (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.