Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Buturlina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/ talk ¦ contribs \ 16:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Anna Buturlina

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG Nswix (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Russia. Nswix (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has 4 other pages and her photo is even available on here. Not to mention that she has a variety of sources listed. KatoKungLee (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment You know that having other Wikipedia pages proves nothing, and doesn't establish notability. Nswix (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: significant coverage in reliable sources, even if little in English-language ones. Moonraker (talk) 12:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as other users have pointed out. I think the page should be improved with a deep dive into Russian-language sources. It appears that the OP has not adequately explained reasoning apart from claiming it fails GNG, but not even saying why, which is unfortunate to see.Historyday01 (talk) 04:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Note to closer, working on a source assessment table, need a couple of hours  // Timothy :: talk  13:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO. It is painfully obvious the keep voters above did not read the sources or do a BEFORE. They present no sources, just make claims and attack the nom. Here is an assessment of the sources in the article:

All of the sources above are promotional, if they mention the subject. BEFORE in English and Russian showed only more promotions, listings, interviews. Nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need reliable sourcing. This might even qualify for a speedy delete, there are not Ind RS for notability. This is basically an unsourced BLP.  // Timothy :: talk  14:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to consider source analysis. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. We have zero sources in the table we can use, and I can't find any. Nothing notable here I'm afraid. Oaktree b (talk) 03:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The only mentions I find is when she joined the other versions of the her character from Frozen onstage at one point to sing a song. It's something, but not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 03:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.